More pleonasms


Good writing and speaking is concise (conciso), period (y punto).

Using many words when there is a shorter option is not erudition (erudición) – it is the contrary (el contrario). Being pleonastic will probably bore your reader.

Here are some more examples of this failing:

  • It is my general opinion that … should be shortened to “I opine that”. 3 words are better than 6.
  • It is my general view that…. should be shortened to “My conspectus is that”. Six words versus 4.
  • It may be possible to….should be shortened to “it is possible that”.
  • By and large (por lo general), the Spanish economy is doing well. Why not write: the Spanish economy is doing well.
  • It goes without saying (ese cae de su peso) that the Spanish economy is doing well. Why not say “the Spanish economy is doing well”.
  • Mr. Podemos went to the bar at 3am in the morning. “3am” means in the morning, so why say “in the morning”.
  • I saw it with my own eyes (lo vi con mis ojos propios). How else can you see it? So why not write: I saw it.
  • After everything was said and done (después de todo lo dicho y hecho) ZP´s government was a failure. Why not write: ZP´s government was a failure.
  • Given the fact that (dado el hecho de que) that Mr. Corbyn lost the election, he should resign. Why write “given the fact that” when you can write: Mr. Corbyn lost the election and should resign.

So no waffle (paja). Remember ABC = accuracy, brevity, clarity (la exactitud, la brevedad, la claridad). Keep life simple.

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on pinterest
Share on whatsapp
Share on email

Últimas publicaciones

Publicaciones relacionadas